What does the implementation of a qualified blind trust not guarantee?

The implementation of a qualified blind trust does not guarantee the complete resolution of potential conflicts of interest. While a blind trust is designed to limit the knowledge and control an individual has over their investments, allowing an independent trustee to manage those assets, it may not eliminate all forms of conflicts entirely.

For example, an individual may still have knowledge of their financial interests or the nature of their investments, which could influence their decisions in public office, even if they are unaware of the specific holdings within the trust. Conflicts can arise from various sources, including personal relationships, obligations, or responsibilities tied to the individual's role in government. Therefore, while blind trusts help to mitigate conflicts, they do not completely eradicate them.

The other options refer to aspects that blind trusts do help to address. Independent management of assets means that someone else is making decisions regarding the investments, reducing the likelihood of bias affecting governance. Separation of personal and official interests aims to prevent personal financial interests from interfering with official duties. Lastly, the ability to freely participate in government matters could be compromised by perceived or actual conflicts, but blind trusts are intended to enable participation without direct personal financial entanglements. Thus, potential conflicts may remain, illustrating why the complete resolution of such conflicts is not guaranteed by